Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Records Show Billions Withdrawn Before Madoff Arrest
About $12 billion was pulled out of accounts at Bernard L. Madoff’s firm in 2008, according to several people briefed on an analysis of Mr. Madoff’s business records.
About $6 billion, or half, was taken out in just the three months before the financier was arrested in December and charged with operating an extensive Ponzi scheme, these people said.
Those figures offer a bit of hope for Mr. Madoff’s thousands of defrauded customers. Under federal law, the trustee overseeing the Madoff bankruptcy can sue to retrieve that money from the investors who withdrew it.
Indeed, the trustee, Irving H. Picard of Baker & Hostetler, filed two lawsuits on Tuesday seeking the return of a total of $6.1 billion, which he estimated had been withdrawn over the last decade.
One case seeks the return of $5.1 billion from various trust funds and partnerships run by Jeffry M. Picower, a prominent Palm Beach, Fla., investor whose charitable foundation was considered one of the notable victims of Mr. Madoff’s fraud.
Mr. Picard also sued to recover $1 billion withdrawn last year by Harley International, a hedge fund based in the Cayman Islands and administered by a unit of the Dutch bank Fortis.
Both lawsuits were filed in Federal Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan. And both assert that the defendants, as professional investors, should have realized that their profits were too high and too consistent — and Mr. Madoff’s paperwork and procedures were too sloppy — to be legitimate.
But the complaint against Mr. Picower goes further, accusing him of participating in a web of transparently false transactions with Mr. Madoff that were aimed at compensating him for “perpetuating the Ponzi scheme” at the expense of other investors.
In 1999, for example, one of Mr. Picower’s accounts posted an annual profit of more than 950 percent, the suit said. That account was one of two that reported annual returns from 1996 to 1999 ranging from 120 percent to more than 550 percent, the suit said.
In other accounts, backdated transactions generated billions of dollars of fictional year-end losses and one account grew by 30 percent in just two weeks in 2006 — thanks to trades that purportedly occurred months before the account was even opened.
A lawyer for Mr. Picower and his wife, Barbara, who was also named as a defendant, denied the allegations.
“Mr. and Mrs. Picower considered themselves friends of the Madoffs for over 35 years,” said the lawyer, William D. Zabel of Schulte Roth & Zabel. “They were totally shocked by his fraud and were in no way complicit in it.”
Mr. Zabel added: “They lost billions in personal assets, and most dear to them, all of the assets of their esteemed foundation.” The Picower Foundation closed its doors after Mr. Madoff’s arrest.
According to people familiar with the analysis of Mr. Madoff’s cash records, most of the $12 billion that flowed out of his fraudulent money-management operation last year was withdrawn by various “feeder funds,” which had raised cash from investors and pooled it to invest with Mr. Madoff.
Several of those feeder funds have already been the targets of lawsuits by Mr. Picard, who is searching for assets to be shared among customers who lost what they believed to be almost $65 billion in the Ponzi scheme.
It is not clear where the cash taken out of the Madoff accounts is located, or how much of it can be recovered through litigation.
In the lawsuit seeking to recover more than $1 billion withdrawn by Harley International, Mr. Picard asserts that the fund should have detected the fraud before investing more than $2 billion of its clients’ money.
According to that complaint, Harley International made 14 transfers out of its Madoff account over the last six years, including $425 million that was withdrawn three months before the Ponzi scheme became public.
A spokeswoman for Harley International, Jamie Moss, did not return calls seeking comment.
In the complaint, Mr. Picard said Harley International, which invested client money with Mr. Madoff since at least 1996, received “unrealistically high and consistent annual returns” of about 13.5 percent. That outpaced the swings in the stock index on which Mr. Madoff had apparently based his trading strategy.
Trading records indicate that the Madoff firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, made at least 148 stock trades in Harley International’s account in the last decade at prices that did not match the trading range for those stocks on the dates the trades supposedly occurred.
Mr. Picard claims those trades should have raised red flags for “any investment professional managing the account.”
The Harley lawsuit is similar to one Mr. Picard has filed recently against J. Ezra Merkin, the New York financier who lost over $2 billion investing with Mr. Madoff.
The lawsuit against Mr. Picower mirrors similar allegations Mr. Picard made in a complaint against Stanley Chais, an investment manager and prominent Los Angeles philanthropist. Both investors have said they intend to fight the lawsuits.
Mr. Picard has raised about $1 billion in assets for Mr. Madoff’s victims, but the lawsuits filed in the last two weeks could push that number much higher.
Mr. Madoff pleaded guilty on March 12 to running the biggest Ponzi scheme in history. He is scheduled to be sentenced next month and faces 150 years in prison.
http://www.nytimes.com/
About $6 billion, or half, was taken out in just the three months before the financier was arrested in December and charged with operating an extensive Ponzi scheme, these people said.
Those figures offer a bit of hope for Mr. Madoff’s thousands of defrauded customers. Under federal law, the trustee overseeing the Madoff bankruptcy can sue to retrieve that money from the investors who withdrew it.
Indeed, the trustee, Irving H. Picard of Baker & Hostetler, filed two lawsuits on Tuesday seeking the return of a total of $6.1 billion, which he estimated had been withdrawn over the last decade.
One case seeks the return of $5.1 billion from various trust funds and partnerships run by Jeffry M. Picower, a prominent Palm Beach, Fla., investor whose charitable foundation was considered one of the notable victims of Mr. Madoff’s fraud.
Mr. Picard also sued to recover $1 billion withdrawn last year by Harley International, a hedge fund based in the Cayman Islands and administered by a unit of the Dutch bank Fortis.
Both lawsuits were filed in Federal Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan. And both assert that the defendants, as professional investors, should have realized that their profits were too high and too consistent — and Mr. Madoff’s paperwork and procedures were too sloppy — to be legitimate.
But the complaint against Mr. Picower goes further, accusing him of participating in a web of transparently false transactions with Mr. Madoff that were aimed at compensating him for “perpetuating the Ponzi scheme” at the expense of other investors.
In 1999, for example, one of Mr. Picower’s accounts posted an annual profit of more than 950 percent, the suit said. That account was one of two that reported annual returns from 1996 to 1999 ranging from 120 percent to more than 550 percent, the suit said.
In other accounts, backdated transactions generated billions of dollars of fictional year-end losses and one account grew by 30 percent in just two weeks in 2006 — thanks to trades that purportedly occurred months before the account was even opened.
A lawyer for Mr. Picower and his wife, Barbara, who was also named as a defendant, denied the allegations.
“Mr. and Mrs. Picower considered themselves friends of the Madoffs for over 35 years,” said the lawyer, William D. Zabel of Schulte Roth & Zabel. “They were totally shocked by his fraud and were in no way complicit in it.”
Mr. Zabel added: “They lost billions in personal assets, and most dear to them, all of the assets of their esteemed foundation.” The Picower Foundation closed its doors after Mr. Madoff’s arrest.
According to people familiar with the analysis of Mr. Madoff’s cash records, most of the $12 billion that flowed out of his fraudulent money-management operation last year was withdrawn by various “feeder funds,” which had raised cash from investors and pooled it to invest with Mr. Madoff.
Several of those feeder funds have already been the targets of lawsuits by Mr. Picard, who is searching for assets to be shared among customers who lost what they believed to be almost $65 billion in the Ponzi scheme.
It is not clear where the cash taken out of the Madoff accounts is located, or how much of it can be recovered through litigation.
In the lawsuit seeking to recover more than $1 billion withdrawn by Harley International, Mr. Picard asserts that the fund should have detected the fraud before investing more than $2 billion of its clients’ money.
According to that complaint, Harley International made 14 transfers out of its Madoff account over the last six years, including $425 million that was withdrawn three months before the Ponzi scheme became public.
A spokeswoman for Harley International, Jamie Moss, did not return calls seeking comment.
In the complaint, Mr. Picard said Harley International, which invested client money with Mr. Madoff since at least 1996, received “unrealistically high and consistent annual returns” of about 13.5 percent. That outpaced the swings in the stock index on which Mr. Madoff had apparently based his trading strategy.
Trading records indicate that the Madoff firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, made at least 148 stock trades in Harley International’s account in the last decade at prices that did not match the trading range for those stocks on the dates the trades supposedly occurred.
Mr. Picard claims those trades should have raised red flags for “any investment professional managing the account.”
The Harley lawsuit is similar to one Mr. Picard has filed recently against J. Ezra Merkin, the New York financier who lost over $2 billion investing with Mr. Madoff.
The lawsuit against Mr. Picower mirrors similar allegations Mr. Picard made in a complaint against Stanley Chais, an investment manager and prominent Los Angeles philanthropist. Both investors have said they intend to fight the lawsuits.
Mr. Picard has raised about $1 billion in assets for Mr. Madoff’s victims, but the lawsuits filed in the last two weeks could push that number much higher.
Mr. Madoff pleaded guilty on March 12 to running the biggest Ponzi scheme in history. He is scheduled to be sentenced next month and faces 150 years in prison.
http://www.nytimes.com/
Nomination Hearing for Regulatory Czar, Cass Sunstein
There were no TV network cameras or overflow crowds of press or lobbyists at the May 12th nomination hearing of Cass R. Sunstein to head up the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management and Budget. The low-profile hearing was in keeping with the relative obscurity of OIRA.
But what the agency does is crucial to business and to ordinary Americans. If confirmed, as expected, Sunstein will be the regulatory czar, sitting in judgment of the rules coming out of agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency. OIRA “exerts enormous influence
Continue reading
Permalink no comments yet
Antitrust’s Big Break
Posted by: Theo Francis on May 11
Anyone who listened to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign can’t be terribly surprised that his Justice Department in breaking with the Bush Administration on antitrust doctrine.
Still, it’s worth noting the vehemence with which Christine A. Varney, Justice’s newly minted antitrust czar, repudiated her predecessors’ "Section 2" report, issued last September (and now bearing a virtual sticky-note linking to the current administration’s rejection of it).
It’s also worth beginning to think about the consequences that rejection will have, because they’re potentially far-reaching.
Continue reading
Permalink 2 comments
Obama Administration Trumpets Budget Cuts
Posted by: Theo Francis on May 06
It's budget day again as the Obama Administration releases a detailed spending plan on Thursday -- and this time, officials are pointing to a more extensive list of spending cuts and program terminations.
The overall budget is still huge, of course, but the administration will be emphasizing cost-cutting measures: 121 programs totaling $17 billion in savings in 2010 and more down the road. While some of the proposals have been heard before -- including Defense Secretary Robert Gates' proposals last month -- an administration officials says 80 of them will be entirely new. About half the cuts will be from the defense budget and half from elsewhere; most will be from the "discretionary" budget -- ie, not from entitlements like Medicare and Social Security.
The message of the day: "This is an important step in the process, but it's only a step." In other words, there's more to come.
The same administration official trotted out five examples of cuts the administration is proposing -- including at least one that has had big backing from Dems in the past.
Napolitano on H-1B: Hire Americans First?
By Moira Herbst
At Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked for DHS secretary Janet Napolitano’s views on the H-1B visa program. (The exchange starts around the 56-minute mark.)
Durbin said that he and Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) “feel that our first obligation is to American workers. And to encourage, if not hold accountable, those firms that are looking to fill spots to first turn to the talent pool in America, and particularly those who've lost a job. Do you have any opinions on the H-1B visa program?”
“I agree with you,” Napolitano said. “Our top obligation [is] to American workers, making sure American workers have jobs.”
The comments were Napolitano’s first public statements on the H-1B visa program since she was named DHS Secretary by President Barack Obama. It was unclear from her remarks whether she was indicating support for the bill Senators Durbin and Grassley introduced on April 23. That bill would require that employers seeking an H-1B visa pledge they have first tried to hire an American worker for the position. Currently, only employers identified as heavy users of the H-1B visa program are required to make such a pledge.
Kosovo's Trip to Washington
Posted by: Steve LeVine on May 01
Dozens of the world’s central bankers rolled into Washington last week for the spring summit of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Members of the elite Group of 7 nations and the more representative Group of 20 discussed under what terms China would contribute a few tens of billions of dollars in IMF financing for the troubled economies of the world; how and when to transform the IMF leadership so it actually reflects how the global economy has evolved over the last half-century; and how to implement an agreement to regulate the financial systems of the world’s leading economies.
But the meeting is also the scene of many smaller, personal missions, and among them last week was that of Ahmet Shala, economics minister of the world’s newest nation, Kosovo. Some five dozen countries have since recognized the Balkan province since it broke off from Serbia and declared independence in February of last year. But the exceptions – among them China, Russia and Spain – have prevented Kosovo from obtaining economic assistance from the IMF, the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Hence Shala’s trip to Washington. He is in a bid to persuade more than half the IMF’s 182 members, or 92 of them, to support Kosovo’s membership application. His feeling was that he was one or two short, hence his nervousness.
http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/money_politics/
But what the agency does is crucial to business and to ordinary Americans. If confirmed, as expected, Sunstein will be the regulatory czar, sitting in judgment of the rules coming out of agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency. OIRA “exerts enormous influence
Continue reading
Permalink no comments yet
Antitrust’s Big Break
Posted by: Theo Francis on May 11
Anyone who listened to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign can’t be terribly surprised that his Justice Department in breaking with the Bush Administration on antitrust doctrine.
Still, it’s worth noting the vehemence with which Christine A. Varney, Justice’s newly minted antitrust czar, repudiated her predecessors’ "Section 2" report, issued last September (and now bearing a virtual sticky-note linking to the current administration’s rejection of it).
It’s also worth beginning to think about the consequences that rejection will have, because they’re potentially far-reaching.
Continue reading
Permalink 2 comments
Obama Administration Trumpets Budget Cuts
Posted by: Theo Francis on May 06
It's budget day again as the Obama Administration releases a detailed spending plan on Thursday -- and this time, officials are pointing to a more extensive list of spending cuts and program terminations.
The overall budget is still huge, of course, but the administration will be emphasizing cost-cutting measures: 121 programs totaling $17 billion in savings in 2010 and more down the road. While some of the proposals have been heard before -- including Defense Secretary Robert Gates' proposals last month -- an administration officials says 80 of them will be entirely new. About half the cuts will be from the defense budget and half from elsewhere; most will be from the "discretionary" budget -- ie, not from entitlements like Medicare and Social Security.
The message of the day: "This is an important step in the process, but it's only a step." In other words, there's more to come.
The same administration official trotted out five examples of cuts the administration is proposing -- including at least one that has had big backing from Dems in the past.
Napolitano on H-1B: Hire Americans First?
By Moira Herbst
At Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked for DHS secretary Janet Napolitano’s views on the H-1B visa program. (The exchange starts around the 56-minute mark.)
Durbin said that he and Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) “feel that our first obligation is to American workers. And to encourage, if not hold accountable, those firms that are looking to fill spots to first turn to the talent pool in America, and particularly those who've lost a job. Do you have any opinions on the H-1B visa program?”
“I agree with you,” Napolitano said. “Our top obligation [is] to American workers, making sure American workers have jobs.”
The comments were Napolitano’s first public statements on the H-1B visa program since she was named DHS Secretary by President Barack Obama. It was unclear from her remarks whether she was indicating support for the bill Senators Durbin and Grassley introduced on April 23. That bill would require that employers seeking an H-1B visa pledge they have first tried to hire an American worker for the position. Currently, only employers identified as heavy users of the H-1B visa program are required to make such a pledge.
Kosovo's Trip to Washington
Posted by: Steve LeVine on May 01
Dozens of the world’s central bankers rolled into Washington last week for the spring summit of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Members of the elite Group of 7 nations and the more representative Group of 20 discussed under what terms China would contribute a few tens of billions of dollars in IMF financing for the troubled economies of the world; how and when to transform the IMF leadership so it actually reflects how the global economy has evolved over the last half-century; and how to implement an agreement to regulate the financial systems of the world’s leading economies.
But the meeting is also the scene of many smaller, personal missions, and among them last week was that of Ahmet Shala, economics minister of the world’s newest nation, Kosovo. Some five dozen countries have since recognized the Balkan province since it broke off from Serbia and declared independence in February of last year. But the exceptions – among them China, Russia and Spain – have prevented Kosovo from obtaining economic assistance from the IMF, the World Bank or the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Hence Shala’s trip to Washington. He is in a bid to persuade more than half the IMF’s 182 members, or 92 of them, to support Kosovo’s membership application. His feeling was that he was one or two short, hence his nervousness.
http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/money_politics/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_veIlkZByPMU4FaKiJD_lDXtk6nMuIWbWBZl_3-NOPE7Q_6pVovSi9fm1fnplHCQH1Vm_FE0z9-2sEVa4672FIzlAWQMc-VVVEhxCWWog=s0-d)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_suZzjXNbX8pigW-LDN5Z4Fr-ZnfFwBWzIm6IhljmcSr4nTvOnQbFEl2q9WYsXJ_k-R0Ea-JxpcjXEbPAHN16qhxDIgJ3TtMNPrmzdB7sNubkWPeyB3XT2QCZDnZp13WflBag=s0-d)
